Studi di Archeologia classica coordinati da Annamaria Comella
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this article was to report the clinical presentation, radiography, culture results, treatment modalities, and outcomes of periocular abscesses associated with brow epilation. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series including 26 patients referred for periocular abscess following brow epilation. RESULTS: Twenty-six female patients with a median age of 20.5 (range, 12-73) years were referred for oculoplastic evaluation of periocular abscesses related to recent brow epilation. All patients were treated with incision and drainage along with systemic antibiotics. Culture results revealed 16 cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 3 of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and 7 cultures that showed no growth. All patients had resolution of their abscesses at 1-month follow-up visits without progression to orbital cellulitis. CONCLUSIONS: Periocular abscess formation after brow epilation has been previously described in only a single case report in the literature. The authors believe this entity is underreported given their current report describing 26 such cases. Given the high prevalence of cosmetic brow epilation in females, the authors believe a careful history regarding brow epilation in any patient presenting with a periocular abscess or preseptal cellulitis is essential to explore the possible cause of their infection. The majority of patients in the current study's cohort had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-related abscesses, and treatment with antibiotics with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus coverage may be a prudent first line choice in such patients.
| Autori: | |
|---|---|
| Pubblicato in: | PubMed, vol. 28, n. 6, pp. 434-7 |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 04/06/2012 |
| Tipo di documento: | Articolo |
| Lingua: | italiano |
| DOI: | 10.4429/j.arart.2011.suppl.20 |
| Accesso aperto: | Accesso aperto Green: copia in un archivio istituzionale o disciplinare – UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) |
| Soggetti: |
Otolaryngology and Infectious Diseases
(Health Sciences > Medicine > Infectious Diseases)
Ocular Infections and Treatments
(Health Sciences > Medicine > Ophthalmology)
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
(Health Sciences > Medicine > Surgery)
|
| Identificativi: | OpenAlex W23034690 · PMID 23034690 |
Dati dell'indice centrale: OpenAlex (licenza CC0).
| Riassunto: | PURPOSE: The aim of this article was to report the clinical presentation, radiography, culture results, treatment modalities, and outcomes of periocular abscesses associated with brow epilation. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series including 26 patients referred for periocular abscess following brow epilation. RESULTS: Twenty-six female patients with a median age of 20.5 (range, 12-73) years were referred for oculoplastic evaluation of periocular abscesses related to recent brow epilation. All patients were treated with incision and drainage along with systemic antibiotics. Culture results revealed 16 cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 3 of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and 7 cultures that showed no growth. All patients had resolution of their abscesses at 1-month follow-up visits without progression to orbital cellulitis. CONCLUSIONS: Periocular abscess formation after brow epilation has been previously described in only a single case report in the literature. The authors believe this entity is underreported given their current report describing 26 such cases. Given the high prevalence of cosmetic brow epilation in females, the authors believe a careful history regarding brow epilation in any patient presenting with a periocular abscess or preseptal cellulitis is essential to explore the possible cause of their infection. The majority of patients in the current study's cohort had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-related abscesses, and treatment with antibiotics with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus coverage may be a prudent first line choice in such patients. |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.4429/j.arart.2011.suppl.20 |