J Clin Exp Dent

Testo completo ad accesso aperto Verifica disponibilità: Testo completo (sito dell'editore)

Abstract

Background: The present in vitro study aimed to compare the efficacy of a 25% copolymer of acrylic acid and maleic acid [poly(AA-co-MA)] and 17% of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in removing calcium hydroxide (CH) from root canals using the master apical file (MAF) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI).Material and Methods: Fifty-eight teeth were dressed with CH.After 10 days, CH was removed using MAF+ED-TA, MAF+poly(AA-co-MA), PUI+EDTA, and PUI+poly (AA-co-MA) (n=12).Ten teeth were used as controls.Residual CH was evaluated using a four-grade scoring system.Data analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U, Friedman, and Dunn-Bonferroni tests.Results: In the MAF and PUI groups, there was no significant difference in the CH scores between EDTA and Poly(AA-co-MA) (p

Salvato in:
Autori: Mehmet Ömer Görduysus iD (Ajman University; University of Sharjah); Mehmet Ömer Görduysus iD (University of Sharjah); Lovely Muthiah Annamma iD (Ajman University)
Pubblicato in: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, vol. 15, n. 10, pp. e827-e834
Data di pubblicazione:01/01/2023
Editore:Medicina Oral S.L.
Tipo di documento:Articolo
Lingua:inglese
DOI: 10.4317/jced.60782
ISSN:1989-5488
Accesso aperto: Accesso aperto Diamond: rivista aperta senza costi per autori e lettori – Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
Citazioni ricevute:2
Soggetti:
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments (Health Sciences > Dentistry > Oral Surgery)
Dental materials and restorations (Health Sciences > Dentistry > Orthodontics)
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection (Life Sciences > Immunology and Microbiology > Microbiology)
calcium hydroxide removal, root canal irrigation, EDTA, passive ultrasonic irrigation, root canal irrigants, root canal dressing
Identificativi: OpenAlex W4387237178 · PMID 37933390

Dati dell'indice centrale: OpenAlex (licenza CC0).

Riassunto:Background: The present in vitro study aimed to compare the efficacy of a 25% copolymer of acrylic acid and maleic acid [poly(AA-co-MA)] and 17% of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in removing calcium hydroxide (CH) from root canals using the master apical file (MAF) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI).Material and Methods: Fifty-eight teeth were dressed with CH.After 10 days, CH was removed using MAF+ED-TA, MAF+poly(AA-co-MA), PUI+EDTA, and PUI+poly (AA-co-MA) (n=12).Ten teeth were used as controls.Residual CH was evaluated using a four-grade scoring system.Data analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U, Friedman, and Dunn-Bonferroni tests.Results: In the MAF and PUI groups, there was no significant difference in the CH scores between EDTA and Poly(AA-co-MA) (p
ISSN:1989-5488
DOI:10.4317/jced.60782